CTATF vs LGPS: Which Is the Better Dividend Stock?
As of September 2026, CTATF and LGPS are closely matched. LGPS offers the higher yield at 5.54%, CTATF has the higher dividend-safety score, and LGPS trades at the larger discount to fair value (+93%).
| Metric | CTATF | LGPS |
|---|---|---|
| Forward yield | 1.20% | 5.54% |
| Annual dividend | $0.40 | $0.05 |
| Payout ratio | 0% | 10% |
| Years of growth | 0 yr | 0 yr |
| 5-yr dividend growth | — | — |
| 5-yr total return | — | — |
| Dividend safety score | — | — |
| Fair value estimate | $42.05 | $1.81 |
| Upside to fair value | -43% | +93% |
| Frequency | monthly | quarterly |
| Market cap | $321.3B | $19.6M |
| P/E ratio | 24.9 | 4.0 |
Higher yield
LGPS
5.54%
Safer dividend
CTATF
—
Faster growth
CTATF
—
Better value
LGPS
+93% upside
CTATF vs LGPS — FAQ
Related comparisons
See more dividend stock comparisons · data refreshes daily · for informational purposes only, not investment advice.