AKO-A vs COST: Which Is the Better Dividend Stock?
As of Oct 27, 2026, AKO-A (Embotelladora Andina S.A.) screens as the stronger dividend stock, winning 5 of 8 head-to-head metrics. AKO-A offers the higher yield at 3.84%, COST has the higher dividend-safety score, and AKO-A looks like the better value (its fair-value estimate is 11% below its share price).
Key facts: AKO-A vs COST
Data as of · Source: SmarterDividends data
- As of Oct 27, 2026, Embotelladora Andina S.A. (AKO-A) has the higher forward dividend yield at 3.84%, versus 0.59% for Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST).
- As of Oct 27, 2026, SmarterDividends grades AKO-A's dividend safety C (61/100) and COST's A (97/100).
- By SmarterDividends' count as of Oct 27, 2026, AKO-A has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and COST for 21.
- As of Oct 27, 2026, AKO-A pays out 20% of its earnings as dividends and COST pays out 27%.
- As of Oct 27, 2026, AKO-A's fair-value estimate is 11% below its share price and COST's fair-value estimate is 51% below its share price, so AKO-A looks like the better value of the two on SmarterDividends' blended model.
Cite this page
SmarterDividends, "AKO-A vs COST: Dividend Yield, Safety & Value Compared," updated Oct 27, 2026, https://smarterdividends.com/compare/ako-a-vs-cost
| Metric | AKO-A | COST |
|---|---|---|
| Forward yield | 3.84% | 0.59% |
| Annual dividend | $0.91 | $5.88 |
| Payout ratio | 20% | 27% |
| Years of growth | 1 yr | 21 yr |
| 5-yr dividend growth | 35.0% | 13.0% |
| 5-yr total return | 128% | 86% |
| Dividend safety score | 61 (C) | 97 (A) |
| Fair value estimate | $21.00 | $489.60 |
| Upside to fair value | -11% | -51% |
| Frequency | quarterly | quarterly |
| Market cap | $3.7B | $445.4B |
| P/E ratio | 12.7 | 48.4 |
Higher yield
AKO-A
3.84%
Safer dividend
COST
Grade A
Faster growth
AKO-A
35.0%
Better value
AKO-A
-11% upside
AKO-A vs COST — FAQ
Is AKO-A or COST a better dividend stock?
On the data, AKO-A wins more head-to-head categories (5 vs 3). AKO-A offers the higher yield (3.84%), while COST has the stronger dividend-safety score. The right pick depends on whether you prioritise income, safety or value.
Which has a higher dividend yield, AKO-A or COST?
AKO-A has the higher forward dividend yield at 3.84%, versus 0.59% for COST.
Is AKO-A or COST safer?
COST has the higher dividend-safety score (97/100 vs 61/100), reflecting stronger payout coverage and dividend-growth history.
Is AKO-A or COST better value right now?
As of Oct 27, 2026, AKO-A looks like the better value: its fair-value estimate is 11% below its share price (fairly valued). For COST, its fair-value estimate is 51% below its share price.
Related comparisons
See more dividend stock comparisons · data refreshes daily · for informational purposes only, not investment advice.