COST vs WMT: Which Is the Better Dividend Stock?
As of June 2026, COST and WMT are closely matched. WMT offers the higher yield at 0.82%, COST has the higher dividend-safety score, and WMT trades at the larger discount to fair value (-50%).
| Metric | COST | WMT |
|---|---|---|
| Forward yield | 0.60% | 0.82% |
| Annual dividend | $5.88 | $0.99 |
| Payout ratio | 27% | 34% |
| Years of growth | 21 yr | 50 yr |
| 5-yr dividend growth | 13.2% | 5.5% |
| 5-yr total return | 148% | 157% |
| Dividend safety score | 95 (A) | 91 (A) |
| Fair value estimate | $425.48 | $60.49 |
| Upside to fair value | -57% | -50% |
| Frequency | quarterly | quarterly |
| Market cap | $435.7B | $963.2B |
| P/E ratio | 49.5 | 42.6 |
Higher yield
WMT
0.82%
Safer dividend
COST
Grade A
Faster growth
COST
13.2%
Better value
WMT
-50% upside
COST vs WMT — FAQ
See more dividend stock comparisons · data refreshes daily · for informational purposes only, not investment advice.