SmarterDividends

BMRPF vs COST: Which Is the Better Dividend Stock?

As of Oct 27, 2026, COST (Costco Wholesale Corporation) screens as the stronger dividend stock, winning 3 of 5 head-to-head metrics. BMRPF offers the higher yield at 3.61%, COST has the higher dividend-safety score, and BMRPF looks like the better value (its fair-value estimate is 58% above its share price).

Key facts: BMRPF vs COST

Data as of · Source: SmarterDividends data

  • As of Oct 27, 2026, B&M European Value Retail plc (BMRPF) has the higher forward dividend yield at 3.61%, versus 0.59% for Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST).
  • By SmarterDividends' count as of Oct 27, 2026, BMRPF has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and COST for 21.
  • As of Oct 27, 2026, BMRPF pays out 81% of its earnings as dividends and COST pays out 27%.
  • As of Oct 27, 2026, BMRPF's fair-value estimate is 58% above its share price and COST's fair-value estimate is 51% below its share price, so BMRPF looks like the better value of the two on SmarterDividends' blended model.
Cite this page

SmarterDividends, "BMRPF vs COST: Dividend Yield, Safety & Value Compared," updated Oct 27, 2026, https://smarterdividends.com/compare/bmrpf-vs-cost

MetricBMRPFCOST
Forward yield3.61%0.59%
Annual dividend$0.13$5.88
Payout ratio81%27%
Years of growth1 yr21 yr
5-yr dividend growth—13.0%
5-yr total return—86%
Dividend safety score—97 (A)
Fair value estimate$5.65$489.60
Upside to fair value+58%-51%
Frequencysemiannualquarterly
Market cap$3.6B$445.4B
P/E ratio16.348.4

Higher yield

BMRPF

3.61%

Safer dividend

COST

Grade A

Faster growth

COST

13.0%

Better value

BMRPF

+58% upside

BMRPF vs COST — FAQ

Is BMRPF or COST a better dividend stock?

On the data, COST wins more head-to-head categories (3 vs 2). BMRPF offers the higher yield (3.61%), while COST has the stronger dividend-safety score. The right pick depends on whether you prioritise income, safety or value.

Which has a higher dividend yield, BMRPF or COST?

BMRPF has the higher forward dividend yield at 3.61%, versus 0.59% for COST.

Is BMRPF or COST safer?

Compare each stock's payout ratio, growth streak and cut history on its detail page to judge safety.

Is BMRPF or COST better value right now?

As of Oct 27, 2026, BMRPF looks like the better value: its fair-value estimate is 58% above its share price (undervalued). For COST, its fair-value estimate is 51% below its share price.

See more dividend stock comparisons · data refreshes daily · for informational purposes only, not investment advice.