COST vs NNFSF: Which Is the Better Dividend Stock?
As of Nov 5, 2026, COST (Costco Wholesale Corporation) screens as the stronger dividend stock, winning 5 of 7 head-to-head metrics. NNFSF offers the higher yield at 2.74%, COST has the higher dividend-safety score, and NNFSF looks like the better value (its fair-value estimate is 9% below its share price).
Key facts: COST vs NNFSF
Data as of · Source: SmarterDividends data
- As of Nov 5, 2026, Nongfu Spring Co., Ltd. (NNFSF) has the higher forward dividend yield at 2.74%, versus 0.56% for Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST).
- As of Nov 5, 2026, SmarterDividends grades COST's dividend safety A (97/100) and NNFSF's B (73/100).
- By SmarterDividends' count as of Nov 5, 2026, COST has raised its dividend for 21 consecutive years and NNFSF for 0.
- As of Nov 5, 2026, COST pays out 27% of its earnings as dividends and NNFSF pays out 66%.
- As of Nov 5, 2026, COST's fair-value estimate is 54% below its share price and NNFSF's fair-value estimate is 9% below its share price, so NNFSF looks like the better value of the two on SmarterDividends' blended model.
Cite this page
SmarterDividends, "COST vs NNFSF: Dividend Yield, Safety & Value Compared," updated Nov 5, 2026, https://smarterdividends.com/compare/cost-vs-nnfsf
| Metric | COST | NNFSF |
|---|---|---|
| Forward yield | 0.56% | 2.74% |
| Annual dividend | $5.88 | $0.14 |
| Payout ratio | 27% | 66% |
| Years of growth | 21 yr | 0 yr |
| 5-yr dividend growth | 13.0% | — |
| 5-yr total return | 88% | 5% |
| Dividend safety score | 97 (A) | 73 (B) |
| Fair value estimate | $491.02 | $4.80 |
| Upside to fair value | -54% | -9% |
| Frequency | quarterly | annual |
| Market cap | $474.6B | $59.2B |
| P/E ratio | 51.6 | 23.9 |
Higher yield
NNFSF
2.74%
Safer dividend
COST
Grade A
Faster growth
COST
13.0%
Better value
NNFSF
-9% upside
COST vs NNFSF — FAQ
Is COST or NNFSF a better dividend stock?
On the data, COST wins more head-to-head categories (5 vs 2). NNFSF offers the higher yield (2.74%), while COST has the stronger dividend-safety score. The right pick depends on whether you prioritise income, safety or value.
Which has a higher dividend yield, COST or NNFSF?
NNFSF has the higher forward dividend yield at 2.74%, versus 0.56% for COST.
Is COST or NNFSF safer?
COST has the higher dividend-safety score (97/100 vs 73/100), reflecting stronger payout coverage and dividend-growth history.
Is COST or NNFSF better value right now?
As of Nov 5, 2026, NNFSF looks like the better value: its fair-value estimate is 9% below its share price (fairly valued). For COST, its fair-value estimate is 54% below its share price.
Related comparisons
See more dividend stock comparisons · data refreshes daily · for informational purposes only, not investment advice.