ASBRF vs COST: Which Is the Better Dividend Stock?
As of Nov 5, 2026, COST (Costco Wholesale Corporation) screens as the stronger dividend stock, winning 6 of 8 head-to-head metrics. ASBRF offers the higher yield at 3.27%, COST has the higher dividend-safety score, and ASBRF looks like the better value (its fair-value estimate is 23% above its share price).
Key facts: ASBRF vs COST
Data as of · Source: SmarterDividends data
- As of Nov 5, 2026, Asahi Group Holdings, Ltd. (ASBRF) has the higher forward dividend yield at 3.27%, versus 0.56% for Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST).
- As of Nov 5, 2026, SmarterDividends grades ASBRF's dividend safety C (58/100) and COST's A (97/100).
- By SmarterDividends' count as of Nov 5, 2026, ASBRF has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and COST for 21.
- As of Nov 5, 2026, ASBRF pays out 47% of its earnings as dividends and COST pays out 27%.
- As of Nov 5, 2026, ASBRF's fair-value estimate is 23% above its share price and COST's fair-value estimate is 54% below its share price, so ASBRF looks like the better value of the two on SmarterDividends' blended model.
Cite this page
SmarterDividends, "ASBRF vs COST: Dividend Yield, Safety & Value Compared," updated Nov 5, 2026, https://smarterdividends.com/compare/asbrf-vs-cost
| Metric | ASBRF | COST |
|---|---|---|
| Forward yield | 3.27% | 0.56% |
| Annual dividend | $0.33 | $5.88 |
| Payout ratio | 47% | 27% |
| Years of growth | 2 yr | 21 yr |
| 5-yr dividend growth | 0.7% | 13.0% |
| 5-yr total return | -19% | 88% |
| Dividend safety score | 58 (C) | 97 (A) |
| Fair value estimate | $12.30 | $491.02 |
| Upside to fair value | +23% | -54% |
| Frequency | semiannual | quarterly |
| Market cap | $14.6B | $474.6B |
| P/E ratio | 14.1 | 51.6 |
Higher yield
ASBRF
3.27%
Safer dividend
COST
Grade A
Faster growth
COST
13.0%
Better value
ASBRF
+23% upside
ASBRF vs COST — FAQ
Is ASBRF or COST a better dividend stock?
On the data, COST wins more head-to-head categories (6 vs 2). ASBRF offers the higher yield (3.27%), while COST has the stronger dividend-safety score. The right pick depends on whether you prioritise income, safety or value.
Which has a higher dividend yield, ASBRF or COST?
ASBRF has the higher forward dividend yield at 3.27%, versus 0.56% for COST.
Is ASBRF or COST safer?
COST has the higher dividend-safety score (97/100 vs 58/100), reflecting stronger payout coverage and dividend-growth history.
Is ASBRF or COST better value right now?
As of Nov 5, 2026, ASBRF looks like the better value: its fair-value estimate is 23% above its share price (undervalued). For COST, its fair-value estimate is 54% below its share price.
Related comparisons
See more dividend stock comparisons · data refreshes daily · for informational purposes only, not investment advice.