COST vs WILCF: Which Is the Better Dividend Stock?
As of Oct 27, 2026, COST (Costco Wholesale Corporation) screens as the stronger dividend stock, winning 5 of 7 head-to-head metrics. WILCF offers the higher yield at 4.03%, COST has the higher dividend-safety score, and WILCF looks like the better value (its fair-value estimate is 17% below its share price).
Key facts: COST vs WILCF
Data as of · Source: SmarterDividends data
- As of Oct 27, 2026, G. Willi-Food International Ltd. (WILCF) has the higher forward dividend yield at 4.03%, versus 0.59% for Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST).
- As of Oct 27, 2026, SmarterDividends grades COST's dividend safety A (97/100) and WILCF's C (54/100).
- By SmarterDividends' count as of Oct 27, 2026, COST has raised its dividend for 21 consecutive years and WILCF for 1.
- As of Oct 27, 2026, COST pays out 27% of its earnings as dividends and WILCF pays out 55%.
- As of Oct 27, 2026, COST's fair-value estimate is 51% below its share price and WILCF's fair-value estimate is 17% below its share price, so WILCF looks like the better value of the two on SmarterDividends' blended model.
Cite this page
SmarterDividends, "COST vs WILCF: Dividend Yield, Safety & Value Compared," updated Oct 27, 2026, https://smarterdividends.com/compare/cost-vs-wilcf
| Metric | COST | WILCF |
|---|---|---|
| Forward yield | 0.59% | 4.03% |
| Annual dividend | $5.88 | $0.98 |
| Payout ratio | 27% | 55% |
| Years of growth | 21 yr | 1 yr |
| 5-yr dividend growth | 13.0% | — |
| 5-yr total return | 86% | 15% |
| Dividend safety score | 97 (A) | 54 (C) |
| Fair value estimate | $489.60 | $20.24 |
| Upside to fair value | -51% | -17% |
| Frequency | quarterly | semiannual |
| Market cap | $445.4B | — |
| P/E ratio | 48.4 | 13.4 |
Higher yield
WILCF
4.03%
Safer dividend
COST
Grade A
Faster growth
COST
13.0%
Better value
WILCF
-17% upside
COST vs WILCF — FAQ
Is COST or WILCF a better dividend stock?
On the data, COST wins more head-to-head categories (5 vs 2). WILCF offers the higher yield (4.03%), while COST has the stronger dividend-safety score. The right pick depends on whether you prioritise income, safety or value.
Which has a higher dividend yield, COST or WILCF?
WILCF has the higher forward dividend yield at 4.03%, versus 0.59% for COST.
Is COST or WILCF safer?
COST has the higher dividend-safety score (97/100 vs 54/100), reflecting stronger payout coverage and dividend-growth history.
Is COST or WILCF better value right now?
As of Oct 27, 2026, WILCF looks like the better value: its fair-value estimate is 17% below its share price (overvalued). For COST, its fair-value estimate is 51% below its share price.
Related comparisons
See more dividend stock comparisons · data refreshes daily · for informational purposes only, not investment advice.