SmarterDividends

CTATF vs RYZ: Which Is the Better Dividend Stock?

As of Oct 18, 2026, CTATF and RYZ are closely matched. RYZ offers the higher yield at 2.73%, RYZ has the higher dividend-safety score, and CTATF looks like the better value (its fair-value estimate is 29% below its share price).

Key facts: CTATF vs RYZ

Data as of · Source: SmarterDividends data

  • As of Oct 18, 2026, Ryerson Holding Corporation (RYZ) has the higher forward dividend yield at 2.73%, versus 0.36% for Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited (CTATF).
  • As of Oct 18, 2026, CTATF's fair-value estimate is 29% below its share price and RYZ's fair-value estimate is 42% below its share price, so CTATF looks like the better value of the two on SmarterDividends' blended model.
Cite this page

SmarterDividends, "CTATF vs RYZ: Dividend Yield, Safety & Value Compared," updated Oct 18, 2026, https://smarterdividends.com/compare/ctatf-vs-ryz

MetricCTATFRYZ
Forward yield0.36%2.73%
Annual dividend$0.40$0.75
Payout ratio0%119%
Years of growth0 yr0 yr
5-yr dividend growth——
5-yr total return—17%
Dividend safety score—62 (C)
Fair value estimate$40.54$15.94
Upside to fair value-29%-42%
Frequencyannualquarterly
Market cap$264.7B$1.4B
P/E ratio21.3—

Higher yield

RYZ

2.73%

Safer dividend

RYZ

Grade C

Faster growth

CTATF

—

Better value

CTATF

-29% upside

CTATF vs RYZ — FAQ

Is CTATF or RYZ a better dividend stock?

CTATF and RYZ are closely matched. RYZ has the higher yield; RYZ scores better on safety.

Which has a higher dividend yield, CTATF or RYZ?

RYZ has the higher forward dividend yield at 2.73%, versus 0.36% for CTATF.

Is CTATF or RYZ safer?

Compare each stock's payout ratio, growth streak and cut history on its detail page to judge safety.

Is CTATF or RYZ better value right now?

As of Oct 18, 2026, CTATF looks like the better value: its fair-value estimate is 29% below its share price (overvalued). For RYZ, its fair-value estimate is 42% below its share price.

See more dividend stock comparisons · data refreshes daily · for informational purposes only, not investment advice.