COCSF vs PM: Which Is the Better Dividend Stock?
As of Nov 6, 2026, PM (Philip Morris International Inc.) screens as the stronger dividend stock, winning 4 of 6 head-to-head metrics. PM offers the higher yield at 3.18%, PM has the higher dividend-safety score.
Key facts: COCSF vs PM
Data as of · Source: SmarterDividends data
- As of Nov 6, 2026, Philip Morris International Inc. (PM) has the higher forward dividend yield at 3.18%, versus 0.19% for Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. (COCSF).
- As of Nov 6, 2026, SmarterDividends grades COCSF's dividend safety D (43/100) and PM's B (73/100).
- By SmarterDividends' count as of Nov 6, 2026, COCSF has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and PM for 13.
Cite this page
SmarterDividends, "COCSF vs PM: Dividend Yield, Safety & Value Compared," updated Nov 6, 2026, https://smarterdividends.com/compare/cocsf-vs-pm
| Metric | COCSF | PM |
|---|---|---|
| Forward yield | 0.19% | 3.18% |
| Annual dividend | $77.40 | $6.40 |
| Payout ratio | 0% | 88% |
| Years of growth | 1 yr | 13 yr |
| 5-yr dividend growth | — | 3.5% |
| 5-yr total return | 106% | 143% |
| Dividend safety score | 43 (D) | 73 (B) |
| Fair value estimate | — | $156.61 |
| Upside to fair value | — | -22% |
| Frequency | semiannual | quarterly |
| Market cap | $24.1B | $314.1B |
| P/E ratio | 143.5 | 29.4 |
Higher yield
PM
3.18%
Safer dividend
PM
Grade B
Faster growth
PM
3.5%
COCSF vs PM — FAQ
Is COCSF or PM a better dividend stock?
On the data, PM wins more head-to-head categories (4 vs 2). PM offers the higher yield (3.18%), while PM has the stronger dividend-safety score. The right pick depends on whether you prioritise income, safety or value.
Which has a higher dividend yield, COCSF or PM?
PM has the higher forward dividend yield at 3.18%, versus 0.19% for COCSF.
Is COCSF or PM safer?
PM has the higher dividend-safety score (73/100 vs 43/100), reflecting stronger payout coverage and dividend-growth history.
Related comparisons
See more dividend stock comparisons · data refreshes daily · for informational purposes only, not investment advice.