DIA vs FDVV: Yield, Cost and Returns Compared
As of Nov 9, 2026, FDVV yields more: 2.79% (dividend yield) against 1.40% for DIA. FDVV is cheaper to own at 0.15% a year vs 0.16%. Over the same 10 years (Sep 2016 to Oct 2026), FDVV returned 13.1% a year with distributions reinvested, and DIA 13.0%.
| Compared | DIA | FDVV |
|---|---|---|
| YieldDividend yield | 1.40% | 2.79% |
| Expense ratio | 0.16% | 0.15% |
| Total return, 1 yr | +10.3% | +14.2% |
| Total return, 3 yr (a year) | +18.0% | +21.9% |
| Total return, 5 yr (a year) | +9.5% | +13.4% |
| Total return, 10 yr (a year) | +13.2% | +13.6% |
| Worst drop since Sep 2016 | -22.6% | -28.4% |
| Share price since Sep 2016 | +183% | +144% |
| Pays | Monthly | Quarterly |
| Issuer | State Street Investment Management | Fidelity |
| Assets | $45.1B | $10.4B |
| Started | 1998 | 2016 |
| Type | Large Value | Large Value |
Higher yield
FDVV
2.79%
Lower cost
FDVV
0.15%
Better total return
FDVV
13.1%/yr
Smaller worst drop
DIA
-22.6%
Key facts: DIA vs FDVV
Data as of · Source: SmarterDividends data
- As of Nov 9, 2026, DIA yields 1.40% (dividend yield) and FDVV yields 2.79% (dividend yield).
- DIA's expense ratio is 0.16% and FDVV's is 0.15%: $16 vs $15 a year on $10,000.
- From Sep 2016 to Oct 2026, $10,000 in DIA grew to $34,304 (13.0% a year) and $10,000 in FDVV to $34,718 (13.1% a year), distributions reinvested.
- Their worst month-end drops over that time: -22.6% for DIA and -28.4% for FDVV.
- 3 of DIA's top ten holdings are also in FDVV's top ten, an overlap of at least 12% of the fund.
Cite this page
SmarterDividends, "DIA vs FDVV: Yield, Cost and Returns Compared," updated Nov 9, 2026, https://smarterdividends.com/compare/dia-vs-fdvv
$10,000 in each, Sep 2016 to Oct 2026
Distributions reinvested, month-end values, with the S&P 500 for reference.
DIA became
$34,304
13.0% a year
FDVV became
$34,718
13.1% a year
Year by year
| Year | DIA | FDVV |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | +14.7% | +17.1% |
| 2024 | +14.8% | +21.8% |
| 2023 | +16.0% | +18.0% |
| 2022 | −7.0% | −4.2% |
| 2021 | +20.8% | +29.3% |
| 2020 | +9.6% | +2.8% |
| 2019 | +25.0% | +23.9% |
| 2018 | −3.7% | −1.2% |
| 2017 | +28.1% | +14.0% |
Total return each calendar year, distributions reinvested.
Top holdings
3 of the top ten overlap, at least 12% of each fund.
DIA
- GS The Goldman Sachs Group Inc10.3%
- CAT Caterpillar Inc7.1%
- MSFT Microsoft Corp6.0%
- AMGN Amgen Inc5.3%
- V Visa Inc Class A4.7%
- UNH UnitedHealth Group Inc4.7%
- TRV The Travelers Companies Inc4.5%
- AAPL Apple Inc4.0%
- JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co3.9%
- SHW Sherwin-Williams Co3.8%
FDVV
- AAPL Apple Inc7.0%
- NVDA NVIDIA Corp6.8%
- MSFT Microsoft Corp5.6%
- DELL Dell Technologies Inc Ordinary Shares - Class C2.8%
- JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co2.7%
- AVGO Broadcom Inc2.7%
- KO Coca-Cola Co2.2%
- PM Philip Morris International Inc2.0%
- PG Procter & Gamble Co1.9%
- BBY Best Buy Co Inc1.9%
DIA vs FDVV: questions
Is DIA or FDVV better?
It depends on the job. FDVV pays more today (2.79% vs 1.40%), FDVV costs less, and FDVV has the better total return over Sep 2016 to Oct 2026, with DIA holding up better in its worst stretch. For income, look at yield and whether the payouts hold up; for growth, total return and drawdowns.
Which pays a higher dividend, DIA or FDVV?
FDVV, at 2.79% against 1.40% for DIA as of Nov 9, 2026. On $10,000 that's about $279 vs $140 a year at today's rates.
Which has the better total return?
FDVV. From Sep 2016 to Oct 2026, it returned 13.1% a year with distributions reinvested, against 13.0% for DIA. $10,000 became $34,718 vs $34,304.
Which is cheaper, DIA or FDVV?
FDVV, with a 0.15% expense ratio against 0.16%.
Do DIA and FDVV hold the same things?
Partly. 3 of their top ten holdings match (MSFT, AAPL, JPM), at least 12% of each fund. Owning both doubles up on those.
Related comparisons
Yields, costs and holdings as each fund reports them (via Yahoo Finance), updated daily; returns from month-end prices with distributions reinvested. FDVV leads on 6 of 8 measures above. For information only, not investment advice. Last fund data: Nov 9, 2026.
