SmarterDividends

ECTM vs PCCYF: Which Is the Better Dividend Stock?

As of Oct 27, 2026, PCCYF (PetroChina Company Limited) screens as the stronger dividend stock, winning 5 of 7 head-to-head metrics. ECTM offers the higher yield at 29.39%, PCCYF has the higher dividend-safety score.

Key facts: ECTM vs PCCYF

Data as of · Source: SmarterDividends data

  • As of Oct 27, 2026, ECA Marcellus Trust I (ECTM) has the higher forward dividend yield at 29.39%, versus 6.08% for PetroChina Company Limited (PCCYF).
  • As of Oct 27, 2026, SmarterDividends grades ECTM's dividend safety C (50/100) and PCCYF's C (64/100).
  • By SmarterDividends' count as of Oct 27, 2026, ECTM has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and PCCYF for 5.
  • As of Oct 27, 2026, ECTM pays out 113% of its earnings as dividends and PCCYF pays out 49%.
Cite this page

SmarterDividends, "ECTM vs PCCYF: Dividend Yield, Safety & Value Compared," updated Oct 27, 2026, https://smarterdividends.com/compare/ectm-vs-pccyf

MetricECTMPCCYF
Forward yield29.39%6.08%
Annual dividend$0.15$0.08
Payout ratio113%49%
Years of growth1 yr5 yr
5-yr dividend growth-19.6%26.0%
5-yr total return-34%134%
Dividend safety score50 (C)64 (C)
Fair value estimate—$1.20
Upside to fair value—-5%
Frequencyquarterlyannual
Market cap$8.8M$310.4B
P/E ratio3.39.0

Higher yield

ECTM

29.39%

Safer dividend

PCCYF

Grade C

Faster growth

PCCYF

26.0%

ECTM vs PCCYF — FAQ

Is ECTM or PCCYF a better dividend stock?

On the data, PCCYF wins more head-to-head categories (5 vs 2). ECTM offers the higher yield (29.39%), while PCCYF has the stronger dividend-safety score. The right pick depends on whether you prioritise income, safety or value.

Which has a higher dividend yield, ECTM or PCCYF?

ECTM has the higher forward dividend yield at 29.39%, versus 6.08% for PCCYF.

Is ECTM or PCCYF safer?

PCCYF has the higher dividend-safety score (64/100 vs 50/100), reflecting stronger payout coverage and dividend-growth history.

See more dividend stock comparisons · data refreshes daily · for informational purposes only, not investment advice.