FTIHX vs IEFA: Yield, Cost and Returns Compared
As of Nov 5, 2026, IEFA yields more: 3.39% (dividend yield) against 2.49% for FTIHX. FTIHX is cheaper to own at 0.06% a year vs 0.07%. Over the same 10 years (Jun 2016 to Oct 2026), IEFA returned 9.3% a year with distributions reinvested, and FTIHX 9.2%.
| Compared | FTIHX | IEFA |
|---|---|---|
| YieldDividend yield | 2.49% | 3.39% |
| Expense ratio | 0.06% | 0.07% |
| Total return, 1 yr | +13.4% | +13.3% |
| Total return, 3 yr (a year) | +20.5% | +19.5% |
| Total return, 5 yr (a year) | +8.1% | +8.2% |
| Total return, 10 yr (a year) | +9.0% | +9.2% |
| Worst drop since Jun 2016 | -28.2% | -28.6% |
| Share price since Jun 2016 | +98% | +86% |
| Pays | Annual | Semiannual |
| Issuer | Fidelity | iShares |
| Assets | $26.0B | $189.3B |
| Started | 2016 | 2012 |
| Type | Foreign Large Blend | Foreign Large Blend |
Higher yield
IEFA
3.39%
Lower cost
FTIHX
0.06%
Better total return
IEFA
9.3%/yr
Smaller worst drop
FTIHX
-28.2%
Key facts: FTIHX vs IEFA
Data as of · Source: SmarterDividends data
- As of Nov 5, 2026, FTIHX yields 2.49% (dividend yield) and IEFA yields 3.39% (dividend yield).
- FTIHX's expense ratio is 0.06% and IEFA's is 0.07%: $6 vs $7 a year on $10,000.
- From Jun 2016 to Oct 2026, $10,000 in FTIHX grew to $24,739 (9.2% a year) and $10,000 in IEFA to $25,081 (9.3% a year), distributions reinvested.
- Their worst month-end drops over that time: -28.2% for FTIHX and -28.6% for IEFA.
- 3 of FTIHX's top ten holdings are also in IEFA's top ten, an overlap of at least 3% of the fund.
Cite this page
SmarterDividends, "FTIHX vs IEFA: Yield, Cost and Returns Compared," updated Nov 5, 2026, https://smarterdividends.com/compare/ftihx-vs-iefa
$10,000 in each, Jun 2016 to Oct 2026
Distributions reinvested, month-end values, with the S&P 500 for reference.
FTIHX became
$24,739
9.2% a year
IEFA became
$25,081
9.3% a year
Year by year
| Year | FTIHX | IEFA |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | +32.6% | +32.1% |
| 2024 | +5.0% | +3.3% |
| 2023 | +15.5% | +17.9% |
| 2022 | −16.3% | −15.3% |
| 2021 | +8.4% | +11.6% |
| 2020 | +11.1% | +8.2% |
| 2019 | +21.5% | +22.6% |
| 2018 | −14.4% | −14.1% |
| 2017 | +27.7% | +26.6% |
Total return each calendar year, distributions reinvested.
Top holdings
3 of the top ten overlap, at least 3% of each fund.
FTIHX
- Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd4.1%
- Samsung Electronics Co Ltd2.0%
- SK hynix Inc1.5%
- ASML.AS ASML Holding NV1.5%
- Tencent Holdings Ltd0.8%
- HSBA.L HSBC Holdings PLC0.8%
- ROP.SW Roche Holding AG Ordinary Shares new0.7%
IEFA
- ASML.AS ASML Holding NV2.5%
- ROP.SW Roche Holding AG Ordinary Shares new1.4%
- SHEL.L Shell PLC1.3%
- NOVN.SW Novartis AG Registered Shares1.2%
- HSBA.L HSBC Holdings PLC1.2%
- AZN.L AstraZeneca PLC1.1%
- NESN.SW Nestle SA1.1%
- SAP.DE SAP SE1.0%
- Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc0.9%
- SIE.DE Siemens AG0.9%
FTIHX vs IEFA: questions
Is FTIHX or IEFA better?
It depends on the job. IEFA pays more today (3.39% vs 2.49%), FTIHX costs less, and IEFA has the better total return over Jun 2016 to Oct 2026, with FTIHX holding up better in its worst stretch. For income, look at yield and whether the payouts hold up; for growth, total return and drawdowns.
Which pays a higher dividend, FTIHX or IEFA?
IEFA, at 3.39% against 2.49% for FTIHX as of Nov 5, 2026. On $10,000 that's about $339 vs $249 a year at today's rates.
Which has the better total return?
IEFA. From Jun 2016 to Oct 2026, it returned 9.3% a year with distributions reinvested, against 9.2% for FTIHX. $10,000 became $25,081 vs $24,739.
Which is cheaper, FTIHX or IEFA?
FTIHX, with a 0.06% expense ratio against 0.07%.
Do FTIHX and IEFA hold the same things?
Partly. 3 of their top ten holdings match (ASML.AS, HSBA.L, ROP.SW), at least 3% of each fund. Owning both doubles up on those.
Yields, costs and holdings as each fund reports them (via Yahoo Finance), updated daily; returns from month-end prices with distributions reinvested. FTIHX leads on 5 of 8 measures above. For information only, not investment advice. Last fund data: Nov 5, 2026.