FTIHX vs IXUS: Yield, Cost and Returns Compared
As of Nov 5, 2026, IXUS yields more: 3.06% (dividend yield) against 2.49% for FTIHX. FTIHX is cheaper to own at 0.06% a year vs 0.07%. Over the same 10 years (Jun 2016 to Oct 2026), IXUS returned 9.3% a year with distributions reinvested, and FTIHX 9.2%.
| Compared | FTIHX | IXUS |
|---|---|---|
| YieldDividend yield | 2.49% | 3.06% |
| Expense ratio | 0.06% | 0.07% |
| Total return, 1 yr | +13.4% | +13.5% |
| Total return, 3 yr (a year) | +20.5% | +20.6% |
| Total return, 5 yr (a year) | +8.1% | +8.1% |
| Total return, 10 yr (a year) | +9.0% | +9.1% |
| Worst drop since Jun 2016 | -28.2% | -28.4% |
| Share price since Jun 2016 | +98% | +89% |
| Pays | Annual | Semiannual |
| Issuer | Fidelity | iShares |
| Assets | $26.0B | $56.8B |
| Started | 2016 | 2012 |
| Type | Foreign Large Blend | Foreign Large Blend |
Higher yield
IXUS
3.06%
Lower cost
FTIHX
0.06%
Better total return
IXUS
9.3%/yr
Smaller worst drop
FTIHX
-28.2%
Key facts: FTIHX vs IXUS
Data as of · Source: SmarterDividends data
- As of Nov 5, 2026, FTIHX yields 2.49% (dividend yield) and IXUS yields 3.06% (dividend yield).
- FTIHX's expense ratio is 0.06% and IXUS's is 0.07%: $6 vs $7 a year on $10,000.
- From Jun 2016 to Oct 2026, $10,000 in FTIHX grew to $24,739 (9.2% a year) and $10,000 in IXUS to $25,000 (9.3% a year), distributions reinvested.
- Their worst month-end drops over that time: -28.2% for FTIHX and -28.4% for IXUS.
- 7 of FTIHX's top ten holdings are also in IXUS's top ten, an overlap of at least 11% of the fund.
Cite this page
SmarterDividends, "FTIHX vs IXUS: Yield, Cost and Returns Compared," updated Nov 5, 2026, https://smarterdividends.com/compare/ftihx-vs-ixus
$10,000 in each, Jun 2016 to Oct 2026
Distributions reinvested, month-end values, with the S&P 500 for reference.
FTIHX became
$24,739
9.2% a year
IXUS became
$25,000
9.3% a year
Year by year
| Year | FTIHX | IXUS |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | +32.6% | +32.4% |
| 2024 | +5.0% | +5.2% |
| 2023 | +15.5% | +15.8% |
| 2022 | −16.3% | −16.5% |
| 2021 | +8.4% | +8.9% |
| 2020 | +11.1% | +10.8% |
| 2019 | +21.5% | +21.7% |
| 2018 | −14.4% | −14.4% |
| 2017 | +27.7% | +28.1% |
Total return each calendar year, distributions reinvested.
Top holdings
7 of the top ten overlap, at least 11% of each fund.
FTIHX
- Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd4.1%
- Samsung Electronics Co Ltd2.0%
- SK hynix Inc1.5%
- ASML.AS ASML Holding NV1.5%
- Tencent Holdings Ltd0.8%
- HSBA.L HSBC Holdings PLC0.8%
- ROP.SW Roche Holding AG Ordinary Shares new0.7%
IXUS
- Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd4.3%
- Samsung Electronics Co Ltd1.9%
- ASML.AS ASML Holding NV1.5%
- SK hynix Inc1.4%
- ROP.SW Roche Holding AG Ordinary Shares new0.8%
- SHEL.L Shell PLC0.8%
- Tencent Holdings Ltd0.7%
- NOVN.SW Novartis AG Registered Shares0.7%
- HSBA.L HSBC Holdings PLC0.7%
- AZN.L AstraZeneca PLC0.7%
FTIHX vs IXUS: questions
Is FTIHX or IXUS better?
It depends on the job. IXUS pays more today (3.06% vs 2.49%), FTIHX costs less, and IXUS has the better total return over Jun 2016 to Oct 2026, with FTIHX holding up better in its worst stretch. For income, look at yield and whether the payouts hold up; for growth, total return and drawdowns.
Which pays a higher dividend, FTIHX or IXUS?
IXUS, at 3.06% against 2.49% for FTIHX as of Nov 5, 2026. On $10,000 that's about $306 vs $249 a year at today's rates.
Which has the better total return?
IXUS. From Jun 2016 to Oct 2026, it returned 9.3% a year with distributions reinvested, against 9.2% for FTIHX. $10,000 became $25,000 vs $24,739.
Which is cheaper, FTIHX or IXUS?
FTIHX, with a 0.06% expense ratio against 0.07%.
Do FTIHX and IXUS hold the same things?
Partly. 7 of their top ten holdings match (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd, Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, ASML.AS, SK hynix Inc), at least 11% of each fund. Owning both doubles up on those.
Yields, costs and holdings as each fund reports them (via Yahoo Finance), updated daily; returns from month-end prices with distributions reinvested. IXUS leads on 5 of 8 measures above. For information only, not investment advice. Last fund data: Nov 5, 2026.