FTIHX vs VEA: Yield, Cost and Returns Compared
As of Nov 5, 2026, FTIHX yields more: 2.49% (dividend yield) against 2.46% for VEA. VEA is cheaper to own at 0.03% a year vs 0.06%. Over the same 10 years (Jun 2016 to Oct 2026), VEA returned 9.9% a year with distributions reinvested, and FTIHX 9.2%.
| Compared | FTIHX | VEA |
|---|---|---|
| YieldDividend yield | 2.49% | 2.46% |
| Expense ratio | 0.06% | 0.03% |
| Total return, 1 yr | +13.4% | +16.9% |
| Total return, 3 yr (a year) | +20.5% | +21.6% |
| Total return, 5 yr (a year) | +8.1% | +9.2% |
| Total return, 10 yr (a year) | +9.0% | +9.8% |
| Worst drop since Jun 2016 | -28.2% | -28.1% |
| Share price since Jun 2016 | +98% | +96% |
| Pays | Annual | Quarterly |
| Issuer | Fidelity | Vanguard |
| Assets | $26.0B | $310.2B |
| Started | 2016 | 2007 |
| Type | Foreign Large Blend | Foreign Large Blend |
Higher yield
FTIHX
2.49%
Lower cost
VEA
0.03%
Better total return
VEA
9.9%/yr
Smaller worst drop
VEA
-28.1%
Key facts: FTIHX vs VEA
Data as of · Source: SmarterDividends data
- As of Nov 5, 2026, FTIHX yields 2.49% (dividend yield) and VEA yields 2.46% (dividend yield).
- FTIHX's expense ratio is 0.06% and VEA's is 0.03%: $6 vs $3 a year on $10,000.
- From Jun 2016 to Oct 2026, $10,000 in FTIHX grew to $24,739 (9.2% a year) and $10,000 in VEA to $26,453 (9.9% a year), distributions reinvested.
- Their worst month-end drops over that time: -28.2% for FTIHX and -28.1% for VEA.
- 5 of FTIHX's top ten holdings are also in VEA's top ten, an overlap of at least 6% of the fund.
Cite this page
SmarterDividends, "FTIHX vs VEA: Yield, Cost and Returns Compared," updated Nov 5, 2026, https://smarterdividends.com/compare/ftihx-vs-vea
$10,000 in each, Jun 2016 to Oct 2026
Distributions reinvested, month-end values, with the S&P 500 for reference.
FTIHX became
$24,739
9.2% a year
VEA became
$26,453
9.9% a year
Year by year
| Year | FTIHX | VEA |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | +32.6% | +35.2% |
| 2024 | +5.0% | +3.1% |
| 2023 | +15.5% | +17.9% |
| 2022 | −16.3% | −15.3% |
| 2021 | +8.4% | +11.7% |
| 2020 | +11.1% | +9.7% |
| 2019 | +21.5% | +22.6% |
| 2018 | −14.4% | −14.7% |
| 2017 | +27.7% | +26.4% |
Total return each calendar year, distributions reinvested.
Top holdings
5 of the top ten overlap, at least 6% of each fund.
FTIHX
- Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd4.1%
- Samsung Electronics Co Ltd2.0%
- SK hynix Inc1.5%
- ASML.AS ASML Holding NV1.5%
- Tencent Holdings Ltd0.8%
- HSBA.L HSBC Holdings PLC0.8%
- ROP.SW Roche Holding AG Ordinary Shares new0.7%
VEA
- Samsung Electronics Co Ltd2.8%
- SK hynix Inc2.3%
- ASML.AS ASML Holding NV2.1%
- HSBA.L HSBC Holdings PLC1.0%
- ROP.SW Roche Holding AG Ordinary Shares new0.9%
- SHEL.L Shell PLC0.9%
- RY Royal Bank of Canada0.9%
- NOVN.SW Novartis AG Registered Shares0.8%
- Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc0.8%
- AZN.L AstraZeneca PLC0.7%
FTIHX vs VEA: questions
Is FTIHX or VEA better?
It depends on the job. FTIHX pays more today (2.49% vs 2.46%), VEA costs less, and VEA has the better total return over Jun 2016 to Oct 2026, with VEA holding up better in its worst stretch. For income, look at yield and whether the payouts hold up; for growth, total return and drawdowns.
Which pays a higher dividend, FTIHX or VEA?
FTIHX, at 2.49% against 2.46% for VEA as of Nov 5, 2026. On $10,000 that's about $249 vs $246 a year at today's rates.
Which has the better total return?
VEA. From Jun 2016 to Oct 2026, it returned 9.9% a year with distributions reinvested, against 9.2% for FTIHX. $10,000 became $26,453 vs $24,739.
Which is cheaper, FTIHX or VEA?
VEA, with a 0.03% expense ratio against 0.06%.
Do FTIHX and VEA hold the same things?
Partly. 5 of their top ten holdings match (Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, SK hynix Inc, ASML.AS, HSBA.L), at least 6% of each fund. Owning both doubles up on those.
Yields, costs and holdings as each fund reports them (via Yahoo Finance), updated daily; returns from month-end prices with distributions reinvested. VEA leads on 6 of 8 measures above. For information only, not investment advice. Last fund data: Nov 5, 2026.