ICSH vs MINT: Yield, Cost and Returns Compared
As of Nov 5, 2026, ICSH yields more: 4.13% (current yield) against 4.08% for MINT. ICSH is cheaper to own at 0.08% a year vs 0.36%. Over the same 12 years (Dec 2013 to Oct 2026), MINT returned 2.4% a year with distributions reinvested, and ICSH 2.3%.
| Compared | ICSH | MINT |
|---|---|---|
| YieldCurrent yield | 4.13% | 4.08% |
| Expense ratio | 0.08% | 0.36% |
| Total return, 1 yr | +3.6% | +4.2% |
| Total return, 3 yr (a year) | +4.9% | +5.0% |
| Total return, 5 yr (a year) | +3.9% | +3.8% |
| Total return, 10 yr (a year) | +2.9% | +2.8% |
| Worst drop since Dec 2013 | -0.9% | -2.7% |
| Share price since Dec 2013 | +1% | −1% |
| Pays | Monthly | Monthly |
| Issuer | iShares | PIMCO |
| Assets | $9.0B | $18.3B |
| Started | 2013 | 2009 |
| Type | Ultra-short bond ETF | Ultra-short bond ETF |
Higher yield
ICSH
4.13%
Lower cost
ICSH
0.08%
Better total return
MINT
2.4%/yr
Smaller worst drop
ICSH
-0.9%
Key facts: ICSH vs MINT
Data as of · Source: SmarterDividends data
- As of Nov 5, 2026, ICSH yields 4.13% (current yield) and MINT yields 4.08% (current yield).
- ICSH's expense ratio is 0.08% and MINT's is 0.36%: $8 vs $36 a year on $10,000.
- From Dec 2013 to Oct 2026, $10,000 in ICSH grew to $13,465 (2.3% a year) and $10,000 in MINT to $13,535 (2.4% a year), distributions reinvested.
- Their worst month-end drops over that time: -0.9% for ICSH and -2.7% for MINT.
Cite this page
SmarterDividends, "ICSH vs MINT: Yield, Cost and Returns Compared," updated Nov 5, 2026, https://smarterdividends.com/compare/icsh-vs-mint
$10,000 in each, Dec 2013 to Oct 2026
Distributions reinvested, month-end values.
ICSH became
$13,465
2.3% a year
MINT became
$13,535
2.4% a year
Year by year
| Year | ICSH | MINT |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | +5.0% | +4.7% |
| 2024 | +5.5% | +5.9% |
| 2023 | +5.6% | +6.3% |
| 2022 | +0.9% | −1.0% |
| 2021 | +0.2% | −0.0% |
| 2020 | +1.6% | +1.6% |
| 2019 | +3.1% | +3.3% |
| 2018 | +2.3% | +1.7% |
| 2017 | +1.6% | +1.8% |
| 2016 | +1.3% | +2.1% |
| 2015 | +0.2% | +0.4% |
| 2014 | +0.1% | +0.5% |
Total return each calendar year, distributions reinvested.
What each holds and how it's taxed
- ICSH · Ultra-short bond ETF
- Holds short-term bonds, which can include corporate or asset-backed debt, for a little more yield than T-bills and a little more price movement.
- MINT · Ultra-short bond ETF
- Holds short-term bonds, which can include corporate or asset-backed debt, for a little more yield than T-bills and a little more price movement.
General information, not tax advice. Every cash fund by yield →
ICSH vs MINT: questions
Is ICSH or MINT better?
It depends on the job. ICSH pays more today (4.13% vs 4.08%), ICSH costs less, and MINT has the better total return over Dec 2013 to Oct 2026, with ICSH holding up better in its worst stretch. For cash you may need soon, yield after tax and how easily you can get the money out matter more than past returns.
Which pays a higher dividend, ICSH or MINT?
ICSH, at 4.13% against 4.08% for MINT as of Nov 5, 2026. On $10,000 that's about $413 vs $408 a year at today's rates.
Which has the better total return?
MINT. From Dec 2013 to Oct 2026, it returned 2.4% a year with distributions reinvested, against 2.3% for ICSH. $10,000 became $13,535 vs $13,465.
Which is cheaper, ICSH or MINT?
ICSH, with a 0.08% expense ratio against 0.36%.
How are ICSH and MINT taxed?
ICSH: Holds short-term bonds, which can include corporate or asset-backed debt, for a little more yield than T-bills and a little more price movement. MINT: Holds short-term bonds, which can include corporate or asset-backed debt, for a little more yield than T-bills and a little more price movement. General information, not tax advice.
Related comparisons
Yields, costs and holdings as each fund reports them (via Yahoo Finance), updated daily; returns from month-end prices with distributions reinvested. ICSH leads on 5 of 7 measures above. For information only, not investment advice. Last fund data: Nov 5, 2026.