SmarterDividends

MGK vs VUG: Yield, Cost and Returns Compared

As of Nov 5, 2026, VUG yields more: 0.42% (dividend yield) against 0.36% for MGK. VUG is cheaper to own at 0.03% a year vs 0.05%. Over the same 18 years (Dec 2007 to Oct 2026), MGK returned 13.3% a year with distributions reinvested, and VUG 12.8%.

ComparedMGKVUG
YieldDividend yield0.36%0.42%
Expense ratio0.05%0.03%
Total return, 1 yr+3.6%+2.7%
Total return, 3 yr (a year)+25.2%+24.6%
Total return, 5 yr (a year)+11.9%+10.8%
Total return, 10 yr (a year)+18.5%+17.6%
Worst drop since Dec 2007-43.8%-45.4%
Share price since Dec 2007+769%+691%
PaysQuarterlyQuarterly
IssuerVanguardVanguard
Assets$33.1B$380.0B
Started20072004
TypeLarge GrowthLarge Growth

Higher yield

VUG

0.42%

Lower cost

VUG

0.03%

Better total return

MGK

13.3%/yr

Smaller worst drop

MGK

-43.8%

Key facts: MGK vs VUG

Data as of · Source: SmarterDividends data

  • As of Nov 5, 2026, MGK yields 0.36% (dividend yield) and VUG yields 0.42% (dividend yield).
  • MGK's expense ratio is 0.05% and VUG's is 0.03%: $5 vs $3 a year on $10,000.
  • From Dec 2007 to Oct 2026, $10,000 in MGK grew to $105,786 (13.3% a year) and $10,000 in VUG to $96,222 (12.8% a year), distributions reinvested.
  • Their worst month-end drops over that time: -43.8% for MGK and -45.4% for VUG.
  • 10 of MGK's top ten holdings are also in VUG's top ten, an overlap of at least 62% of the fund.
Cite this page

SmarterDividends, "MGK vs VUG: Yield, Cost and Returns Compared," updated Nov 5, 2026, https://smarterdividends.com/compare/mgk-vs-vug

$10,000 in each, Dec 2007 to Oct 2026

Distributions reinvested, month-end values, with the S&P 500 for reference.

MGK became

$105,786

13.3% a year

VUG became

$96,222

12.8% a year

Try other dates, monthly additions or more tickers →

Year by year

YearMGKVUG
2025+20.7%+19.4%
2024+32.9%+32.7%
2023+51.7%+46.8%
2022−33.6%−33.1%
2021+28.6%+27.4%
2020+40.9%+40.2%
2019+37.4%+37.0%
2018−2.9%−3.3%
2017+29.6%+27.8%
2016+6.5%+6.2%
2015+3.7%+3.3%
2014+13.6%+13.6%
2013+32.6%+32.6%
2012+17.3%+17.1%
2011+3.2%+1.8%
2010+14.6%+17.1%
2009+34.8%+36.3%
2008−36.3%−38.0%

Total return each calendar year, distributions reinvested.

Top holdings

10 of the top ten overlap, at least 62% of each fund.

MGK

  1. NVDA NVIDIA Corp13.7%
  2. AAPL Apple Inc12.5%
  3. MSFT Microsoft Corp9.5%
  4. GOOGL Alphabet Inc Class A5.0%
  5. META Meta Platforms Inc Class A5.0%
  6. AVGO Broadcom Inc4.3%
  7. AMZN Amazon.com Inc4.2%
  8. GOOG Alphabet Inc Class C3.9%
  9. AMD Advanced Micro Devices Inc3.2%
  10. TSLA Tesla Inc3.1%

VUG

  1. NVDA NVIDIA Corp13.5%
  2. AAPL Apple Inc12.5%
  3. MSFT Microsoft Corp9.7%
  4. GOOGL Alphabet Inc Class A5.2%
  5. AVGO Broadcom Inc4.3%
  6. AMZN Amazon.com Inc4.3%
  7. META Meta Platforms Inc Class A4.2%
  8. GOOG Alphabet Inc Class C4.1%
  9. AMD Advanced Micro Devices Inc2.7%
  10. TSLA Tesla Inc2.7%

MGK vs VUG: questions

Is MGK or VUG better?

It depends on the job. VUG pays more today (0.42% vs 0.36%), VUG costs less, and MGK has the better total return over Dec 2007 to Oct 2026, with MGK holding up better in its worst stretch. For income, look at yield and whether the payouts hold up; for growth, total return and drawdowns.

Which pays a higher dividend, MGK or VUG?

VUG, at 0.42% against 0.36% for MGK as of Nov 5, 2026. On $10,000 that's about $42 vs $36 a year at today's rates.

Which has the better total return?

MGK. From Dec 2007 to Oct 2026, it returned 13.3% a year with distributions reinvested, against 12.8% for VUG. $10,000 became $105,786 vs $96,222.

Which is cheaper, MGK or VUG?

VUG, with a 0.03% expense ratio against 0.05%.

Do MGK and VUG hold the same things?

Partly. 10 of their top ten holdings match (NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, GOOGL), at least 62% of each fund. Owning both doubles up on those.

Yields, costs and holdings as each fund reports them (via Yahoo Finance), updated daily; returns from month-end prices with distributions reinvested. MGK leads on 6 of 8 measures above. For information only, not investment advice. Last fund data: Nov 5, 2026.