MTUM vs VTSAX: Yield, Cost and Returns Compared
As of Nov 5, 2026, MTUM yields more: 2.87% (dividend yield) against 0.79% for VTSAX. VTSAX is cheaper to own at 0.04% a year vs 0.15%. Over the same 13 years (Apr 2013 to Oct 2026), MTUM returned 15.1% a year with distributions reinvested, and VTSAX 13.7%.
| Compared | MTUM | VTSAX |
|---|---|---|
| YieldDividend yield | 2.87% | 0.79% |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.04% |
| Total return, 1 yr | +12.5% | +11.8% |
| Total return, 3 yr (a year) | — | +23.0% |
| Total return, 5 yr (a year) | +9.5% | +10.9% |
| Total return, 10 yr (a year) | +15.4% | +14.8% |
| Worst drop since Apr 2013 | -81.8% | -24.9% |
| Share price since Apr 2013 | +448% | +351% |
| Pays | Quarterly | Quarterly |
| Issuer | iShares | Vanguard |
| Assets | $17.8B | $2.3T |
| Started | 2013 | 2001 |
| Type | Large Blend | Large Blend |
Higher yield
MTUM
2.87%
Lower cost
VTSAX
0.04%
Better total return
MTUM
15.1%/yr
Smaller worst drop
VTSAX
-24.9%
Key facts: MTUM vs VTSAX
Data as of · Source: SmarterDividends data
- As of Nov 5, 2026, MTUM yields 2.87% (dividend yield) and VTSAX yields 0.79% (dividend yield).
- MTUM's expense ratio is 0.15% and VTSAX's is 0.04%: $15 vs $4 a year on $10,000.
- From Apr 2013 to Oct 2026, $10,000 in MTUM grew to $64,145 (15.1% a year) and $10,000 in VTSAX to $56,352 (13.7% a year), distributions reinvested.
- Their worst month-end drops over that time: -81.8% for MTUM and -24.9% for VTSAX.
- 2 of MTUM's top ten holdings are also in VTSAX's top ten, an overlap of at least 4% of the fund.
Cite this page
SmarterDividends, "MTUM vs VTSAX: Yield, Cost and Returns Compared," updated Nov 5, 2026, https://smarterdividends.com/compare/mtum-vs-vtsax
$10,000 in each, Apr 2013 to Oct 2026
Distributions reinvested, month-end values, with the S&P 500 for reference.
MTUM became
$64,145
15.1% a year
VTSAX became
$56,352
13.7% a year
Year by year
| Year | MTUM | VTSAX |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | +22.1% | +17.1% |
| 2024 | +32.9% | +23.7% |
| 2023 | +9.2% | +26.0% |
| 2022 | −18.3% | −19.5% |
| 2021 | +13.4% | +25.7% |
| 2020 | +29.9% | +21.0% |
| 2019 | +27.3% | +30.8% |
| 2018 | −1.7% | −5.2% |
| 2017 | +37.5% | +21.2% |
| 2016 | +5.0% | +12.7% |
| 2015 | +8.9% | +0.4% |
| 2014 | +14.6% | +12.6% |
Total return each calendar year, distributions reinvested.
Top holdings
2 of the top ten overlap, at least 4% of each fund.
MTUM
- AMD Advanced Micro Devices Inc5.8%
- MU Micron Technology Inc5.0%
- JNJ Johnson & Johnson3.7%
- CSCO Cisco Systems Inc3.6%
- XOM ExxonMobil Holdings Corp3.2%
- INTC Intel Corp2.9%
- PANW Palo Alto Networks Inc2.8%
- AMAT Applied Materials Inc2.6%
- GOOGL Alphabet Inc Class A2.4%
- UNH UnitedHealth Group Inc2.3%
VTSAX
- NVDA NVIDIA Corp7.1%
- AAPL Apple Inc6.6%
- MSFT Microsoft Corp5.2%
- AMZN Amazon.com Inc3.3%
- GOOGL Alphabet Inc Class A2.8%
- AVGO Broadcom Inc2.3%
- META Meta Platforms Inc Class A2.2%
- GOOG Alphabet Inc Class C2.2%
- MU Micron Technology Inc1.6%
- TSLA Tesla Inc1.4%
MTUM vs VTSAX: questions
Is MTUM or VTSAX better?
It depends on the job. MTUM pays more today (2.87% vs 0.79%), VTSAX costs less, and MTUM has the better total return over Apr 2013 to Oct 2026, with VTSAX holding up better in its worst stretch. For income, look at yield and whether the payouts hold up; for growth, total return and drawdowns.
Which pays a higher dividend, MTUM or VTSAX?
MTUM, at 2.87% against 0.79% for VTSAX as of Nov 5, 2026. On $10,000 that's about $287 vs $79 a year at today's rates.
Which has the better total return?
MTUM. From Apr 2013 to Oct 2026, it returned 15.1% a year with distributions reinvested, against 13.7% for VTSAX. $10,000 became $64,145 vs $56,352.
Which is cheaper, MTUM or VTSAX?
VTSAX, with a 0.04% expense ratio against 0.15%.
Do MTUM and VTSAX hold the same things?
Partly. 2 of their top ten holdings match (GOOGL, MU), at least 4% of each fund. Owning both doubles up on those.
Yields, costs and holdings as each fund reports them (via Yahoo Finance), updated daily; returns from month-end prices with distributions reinvested. MTUM leads on 4 of 7 measures above. For information only, not investment advice. Last fund data: Nov 5, 2026.