DGRW vs VTI: Yield, Cost and Returns Compared
As of Nov 8, 2026, DGRW yields more: 1.27% (dividend yield) against 1.09% for VTI. VTI is cheaper to own at 0.03% a year vs 0.28%. Over the same 13 years (May 2013 to Oct 2026), VTI returned 13.6% a year with distributions reinvested, and DGRW 13.1%.
| Compared | DGRW | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| YieldDividend yield | 1.27% | 1.09% |
| Expense ratio | 0.28% | 0.03% |
| Total return, 1 yr | +12.0% | +12.0% |
| Total return, 3 yr (a year) | +18.0% | +23.1% |
| Total return, 5 yr (a year) | +11.4% | +10.9% |
| Total return, 10 yr (a year) | +14.2% | +14.9% |
| Worst drop since May 2013 | -19.3% | -24.8% |
| Share price since May 2013 | +300% | +341% |
| Pays | Monthly | Quarterly |
| Issuer | WisdomTree | Vanguard |
| Assets | $16.9B | $2.3T |
| Started | 2013 | 2001 |
| Type | Large Blend | Large Blend |
Higher yield
DGRW
1.27%
Lower cost
VTI
0.03%
Better total return
VTI
13.6%/yr
Smaller worst drop
DGRW
-19.3%
Key facts: DGRW vs VTI
Data as of · Source: SmarterDividends data
- As of Nov 8, 2026, DGRW yields 1.27% (dividend yield) and VTI yields 1.09% (dividend yield).
- DGRW's expense ratio is 0.28% and VTI's is 0.03%: $28 vs $3 a year on $10,000.
- From May 2013 to Oct 2026, $10,000 in DGRW grew to $51,985 (13.1% a year) and $10,000 in VTI to $55,260 (13.6% a year), distributions reinvested.
- Their worst month-end drops over that time: -19.3% for DGRW and -24.8% for VTI.
- 4 of DGRW's top ten holdings are also in VTI's top ten, an overlap of at least 19% of the fund.
Cite this page
SmarterDividends, "DGRW vs VTI: Yield, Cost and Returns Compared," updated Nov 8, 2026, https://smarterdividends.com/compare/dgrw-vs-vti
$10,000 in each, May 2013 to Oct 2026
Distributions reinvested, month-end values, with the S&P 500 for reference.
DGRW became
$51,985
13.1% a year
VTI became
$55,260
13.6% a year
Year by year
| Year | DGRW | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | +12.2% | +17.1% |
| 2024 | +16.8% | +23.8% |
| 2023 | +18.6% | +26.0% |
| 2022 | −6.3% | −19.5% |
| 2021 | +24.5% | +25.7% |
| 2020 | +13.9% | +21.1% |
| 2019 | +29.5% | +30.7% |
| 2018 | −5.4% | −5.2% |
| 2017 | +26.9% | +21.2% |
| 2016 | +12.1% | +12.8% |
| 2015 | −0.2% | +0.4% |
| 2014 | +13.7% | +12.5% |
Total return each calendar year, distributions reinvested.
Top holdings
4 of the top ten overlap, at least 19% of each fund.
DGRW
- NVDA NVIDIA Corp7.9%
- MSFT Microsoft Corp7.8%
- AAPL Apple Inc4.5%
- KO Coca-Cola Co3.2%
- META Meta Platforms Inc Class A3.1%
- UNH UnitedHealth Group Inc2.8%
- HD The Home Depot Inc2.5%
- JNJ Johnson & Johnson2.4%
- ABBV AbbVie Inc2.4%
- XOM ExxonMobil Holdings Corp2.1%
VTI
- NVDA NVIDIA Corp7.1%
- AAPL Apple Inc6.6%
- MSFT Microsoft Corp5.2%
- AMZN Amazon.com Inc3.3%
- GOOGL Alphabet Inc Class A2.8%
- AVGO Broadcom Inc2.3%
- META Meta Platforms Inc Class A2.2%
- GOOG Alphabet Inc Class C2.2%
- MU Micron Technology Inc1.6%
- TSLA Tesla Inc1.4%
DGRW vs VTI: questions
Is DGRW or VTI better?
It depends on the job. DGRW pays more today (1.27% vs 1.09%), VTI costs less, and VTI has the better total return over May 2013 to Oct 2026, with DGRW holding up better in its worst stretch. For income, look at yield and whether the payouts hold up; for growth, total return and drawdowns.
Which pays a higher dividend, DGRW or VTI?
DGRW, at 1.27% against 1.09% for VTI as of Nov 8, 2026. On $10,000 that's about $127 vs $109 a year at today's rates.
Which has the better total return?
VTI. From May 2013 to Oct 2026, it returned 13.6% a year with distributions reinvested, against 13.1% for DGRW. $10,000 became $55,260 vs $51,985.
Which is cheaper, DGRW or VTI?
VTI, with a 0.03% expense ratio against 0.28%.
Do DGRW and VTI hold the same things?
Partly. 4 of their top ten holdings match (NVDA, MSFT, AAPL, META), at least 19% of each fund. Owning both doubles up on those.
Related comparisons
Yields, costs and holdings as each fund reports them (via Yahoo Finance), updated daily; returns from month-end prices with distributions reinvested. VTI leads on 5 of 8 measures above. For information only, not investment advice. Last fund data: Nov 8, 2026.
