SmarterDividends

FSKAX vs IVV: Yield, Cost and Returns Compared

As of Nov 5, 2026, IVV yields more: 1.12% (dividend yield) against 0.92% for FSKAX. FSKAX is cheaper to own at 0.01% a year vs 0.03%. Over the same 15 years (Sep 2011 to Oct 2026), IVV returned 15.4% a year with distributions reinvested, and FSKAX 15.1%.

ComparedFSKAXIVV
YieldDividend yield0.92%1.12%
Expense ratio0.01%0.03%
Total return, 1 yr+11.9%+12.1%
Total return, 3 yr (a year)+23.1%+23.4%
Total return, 5 yr (a year)+11.0%+12.0%
Total return, 10 yr (a year)+14.8%+15.4%
Worst drop since Sep 2011-24.9%-23.9%
Share price since Sep 2011+537%+568%
PaysQuarterlyQuarterly
IssuerFidelityiShares
Assets$140.9B$870.0B
Started20112000
TypeLarge BlendLarge Blend

Higher yield

IVV

1.12%

Lower cost

FSKAX

0.01%

Better total return

IVV

15.4%/yr

Smaller worst drop

IVV

-23.9%

Key facts: FSKAX vs IVV

Data as of · Source: SmarterDividends data

  • As of Nov 5, 2026, FSKAX yields 0.92% (dividend yield) and IVV yields 1.12% (dividend yield).
  • FSKAX's expense ratio is 0.01% and IVV's is 0.03%: $1 vs $3 a year on $10,000.
  • From Sep 2011 to Oct 2026, $10,000 in FSKAX grew to $83,074 (15.1% a year) and $10,000 in IVV to $86,883 (15.4% a year), distributions reinvested.
  • Their worst month-end drops over that time: -24.9% for FSKAX and -23.9% for IVV.
  • 10 of FSKAX's top ten holdings are also in IVV's top ten, an overlap of at least 34% of the fund.
Cite this page

SmarterDividends, "FSKAX vs IVV: Yield, Cost and Returns Compared," updated Nov 5, 2026, https://smarterdividends.com/compare/fskax-vs-ivv

$10,000 in each, Sep 2011 to Oct 2026

Distributions reinvested, month-end values, with the S&P 500 for reference.

FSKAX became

$83,074

15.1% a year

IVV became

$86,883

15.4% a year

Try other dates, monthly additions or more tickers →

Year by year

YearFSKAXIVV
2025+17.1%+17.8%
2024+23.9%+24.9%
2023+26.1%+26.3%
2022−19.5%−18.2%
2021+25.7%+28.8%
2020+20.8%+18.4%
2019+30.9%+31.3%
2018−5.3%−4.5%
2017+21.2%+21.8%
2016+12.7%+12.1%
2015+0.4%+0.7%
2014+12.5%+13.6%
2013+33.4%+32.3%
2012+16.4%+16.1%

Total return each calendar year, distributions reinvested.

Top holdings

10 of the top ten overlap, at least 34% of each fund.

FSKAX

  1. NVDA NVIDIA Corp7.2%
  2. AAPL Apple Inc6.2%
  3. MSFT Microsoft Corp5.1%
  4. AMZN Amazon.com Inc3.4%
  5. GOOGL Alphabet Inc Class A2.7%
  6. AVGO Broadcom Inc2.4%
  7. GOOG Alphabet Inc Class C2.1%
  8. META Meta Platforms Inc Class A1.7%
  9. MU Micron Technology Inc1.5%
  10. TSLA Tesla Inc1.4%

IVV

  1. NVDA NVIDIA Corp8.4%
  2. AAPL Apple Inc7.4%
  3. MSFT Microsoft Corp5.8%
  4. AMZN Amazon.com Inc3.7%
  5. GOOGL Alphabet Inc Class A3.1%
  6. AVGO Broadcom Inc2.5%
  7. GOOG Alphabet Inc Class C2.5%
  8. META Meta Platforms Inc Class A2.4%
  9. MU Micron Technology Inc1.8%
  10. TSLA Tesla Inc1.5%

FSKAX vs IVV: questions

Is FSKAX or IVV better?

It depends on the job. IVV pays more today (1.12% vs 0.92%), FSKAX costs less, and IVV has the better total return over Sep 2011 to Oct 2026, with IVV holding up better in its worst stretch. For income, look at yield and whether the payouts hold up; for growth, total return and drawdowns.

Which pays a higher dividend, FSKAX or IVV?

IVV, at 1.12% against 0.92% for FSKAX as of Nov 5, 2026. On $10,000 that's about $112 vs $92 a year at today's rates.

Which has the better total return?

IVV. From Sep 2011 to Oct 2026, it returned 15.4% a year with distributions reinvested, against 15.1% for FSKAX. $10,000 became $86,883 vs $83,074.

Which is cheaper, FSKAX or IVV?

FSKAX, with a 0.01% expense ratio against 0.03%.

Do FSKAX and IVV hold the same things?

Partly. 10 of their top ten holdings match (NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN), at least 34% of each fund. Owning both doubles up on those.

Related comparisons

Yields, costs and holdings as each fund reports them (via Yahoo Finance), updated daily; returns from month-end prices with distributions reinvested. IVV leads on 7 of 8 measures above. For information only, not investment advice. Last fund data: Nov 5, 2026.