SmarterDividends

FSKAX vs VOO: Yield, Cost and Returns Compared

As of Nov 5, 2026, VOO yields more: 1.08% (dividend yield) against 0.92% for FSKAX. FSKAX is cheaper to own at 0.01% a year vs 0.03%. Over the same 15 years (Sep 2011 to Oct 2026), VOO returned 15.5% a year with distributions reinvested, and FSKAX 15.1%.

ComparedFSKAXVOO
YieldDividend yield0.92%1.08%
Expense ratio0.01%0.03%
Total return, 1 yr+11.9%+12.1%
Total return, 3 yr (a year)+23.1%+23.4%
Total return, 5 yr (a year)+11.0%+12.0%
Total return, 10 yr (a year)+14.8%+15.4%
Worst drop since Sep 2011-24.9%-23.9%
Share price since Sep 2011+537%+571%
PaysQuarterlyQuarterly
IssuerFidelityVanguard
Assets$140.9B$1.7T
Started20112010
TypeLarge BlendLarge Blend

Higher yield

VOO

1.08%

Lower cost

FSKAX

0.01%

Better total return

VOO

15.5%/yr

Smaller worst drop

VOO

-23.9%

Key facts: FSKAX vs VOO

Data as of · Source: SmarterDividends data

  • As of Nov 5, 2026, FSKAX yields 0.92% (dividend yield) and VOO yields 1.08% (dividend yield).
  • FSKAX's expense ratio is 0.01% and VOO's is 0.03%: $1 vs $3 a year on $10,000.
  • From Sep 2011 to Oct 2026, $10,000 in FSKAX grew to $83,074 (15.1% a year) and $10,000 in VOO to $87,629 (15.5% a year), distributions reinvested.
  • Their worst month-end drops over that time: -24.9% for FSKAX and -23.9% for VOO.
  • 10 of FSKAX's top ten holdings are also in VOO's top ten, an overlap of at least 34% of the fund.
Cite this page

SmarterDividends, "FSKAX vs VOO: Yield, Cost and Returns Compared," updated Nov 5, 2026, https://smarterdividends.com/compare/fskax-vs-voo

$10,000 in each, Sep 2011 to Oct 2026

Distributions reinvested, month-end values, with the S&P 500 for reference.

FSKAX became

$83,074

15.1% a year

VOO became

$87,629

15.5% a year

Try other dates, monthly additions or more tickers →

Year by year

YearFSKAXVOO
2025+17.1%+17.8%
2024+23.9%+25.0%
2023+26.1%+26.3%
2022−19.5%−18.2%
2021+25.7%+28.8%
2020+20.8%+18.3%
2019+30.9%+31.4%
2018−5.3%−4.5%
2017+21.2%+21.8%
2016+12.7%+12.2%
2015+0.4%+1.3%
2014+12.5%+13.5%
2013+33.4%+32.4%
2012+16.4%+16.0%

Total return each calendar year, distributions reinvested.

Top holdings

10 of the top ten overlap, at least 34% of each fund.

FSKAX

  1. NVDA NVIDIA Corp7.2%
  2. AAPL Apple Inc6.2%
  3. MSFT Microsoft Corp5.1%
  4. AMZN Amazon.com Inc3.4%
  5. GOOGL Alphabet Inc Class A2.7%
  6. AVGO Broadcom Inc2.4%
  7. GOOG Alphabet Inc Class C2.1%
  8. META Meta Platforms Inc Class A1.7%
  9. MU Micron Technology Inc1.5%
  10. TSLA Tesla Inc1.4%

VOO

  1. NVDA NVIDIA Corp8.4%
  2. AAPL Apple Inc7.4%
  3. MSFT Microsoft Corp5.8%
  4. AMZN Amazon.com Inc3.7%
  5. GOOGL Alphabet Inc Class A3.1%
  6. AVGO Broadcom Inc2.5%
  7. GOOG Alphabet Inc Class C2.5%
  8. META Meta Platforms Inc Class A2.4%
  9. MU Micron Technology Inc1.8%
  10. TSLA Tesla Inc1.5%

FSKAX vs VOO: questions

Is FSKAX or VOO better?

It depends on the job. VOO pays more today (1.08% vs 0.92%), FSKAX costs less, and VOO has the better total return over Sep 2011 to Oct 2026, with VOO holding up better in its worst stretch. For income, look at yield and whether the payouts hold up; for growth, total return and drawdowns.

Which pays a higher dividend, FSKAX or VOO?

VOO, at 1.08% against 0.92% for FSKAX as of Nov 5, 2026. On $10,000 that's about $108 vs $92 a year at today's rates.

Which has the better total return?

VOO. From Sep 2011 to Oct 2026, it returned 15.5% a year with distributions reinvested, against 15.1% for FSKAX. $10,000 became $87,629 vs $83,074.

Which is cheaper, FSKAX or VOO?

FSKAX, with a 0.01% expense ratio against 0.03%.

Do FSKAX and VOO hold the same things?

Partly. 10 of their top ten holdings match (NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN), at least 34% of each fund. Owning both doubles up on those.

Yields, costs and holdings as each fund reports them (via Yahoo Finance), updated daily; returns from month-end prices with distributions reinvested. VOO leads on 7 of 8 measures above. For information only, not investment advice. Last fund data: Nov 5, 2026.