SPMO vs VTI: Yield, Cost and Returns Compared
As of Nov 5, 2026, VTI yields more: 1.08% (dividend yield) against 0.87% for SPMO. VTI is cheaper to own at 0.03% a year vs 0.13%. Over the same 11 years (Oct 2015 to Oct 2026), SPMO returned 17.6% a year with distributions reinvested, and VTI 13.9%.
| Compared | SPMO | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| YieldDividend yield | 0.87% | 1.08% |
| Expense ratio | 0.13% | 0.03% |
| Total return, 1 yr | +12.9% | +12.0% |
| Total return, 3 yr (a year) | +35.4% | +23.1% |
| Total return, 5 yr (a year) | +17.4% | +10.9% |
| Total return, 10 yr (a year) | +19.1% | +14.9% |
| Worst drop since Oct 2015 | -21.3% | -24.8% |
| Share price since Oct 2015 | +421% | +249% |
| Pays | Quarterly | Quarterly |
| Issuer | Invesco | Vanguard |
| Assets | $21.4B | $2.3T |
| Started | 2015 | 2001 |
| Type | Large Blend | Large Blend |
Higher yield
VTI
1.08%
Lower cost
VTI
0.03%
Better total return
SPMO
17.6%/yr
Smaller worst drop
SPMO
-21.3%
Key facts: SPMO vs VTI
Data as of · Source: SmarterDividends data
- As of Nov 5, 2026, SPMO yields 0.87% (dividend yield) and VTI yields 1.08% (dividend yield).
- SPMO's expense ratio is 0.13% and VTI's is 0.03%: $13 vs $3 a year on $10,000.
- From Oct 2015 to Oct 2026, $10,000 in SPMO grew to $59,481 (17.6% a year) and $10,000 in VTI to $41,703 (13.9% a year), distributions reinvested.
- Their worst month-end drops over that time: -21.3% for SPMO and -24.8% for VTI.
- 4 of SPMO's top ten holdings are also in VTI's top ten, an overlap of at least 13% of the fund.
Cite this page
SmarterDividends, "SPMO vs VTI: Yield, Cost and Returns Compared," updated Nov 5, 2026, https://smarterdividends.com/compare/spmo-vs-vti
$10,000 in each, Oct 2015 to Oct 2026
Distributions reinvested, month-end values, with the S&P 500 for reference.
SPMO became
$59,481
17.6% a year
VTI became
$41,703
13.9% a year
Year by year
| Year | SPMO | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | +26.6% | +17.1% |
| 2024 | +45.8% | +23.8% |
| 2023 | +17.6% | +26.0% |
| 2022 | −10.4% | −19.5% |
| 2021 | +22.6% | +25.7% |
| 2020 | +28.2% | +21.1% |
| 2019 | +25.9% | +30.7% |
| 2018 | −0.9% | −5.2% |
| 2017 | +27.8% | +21.2% |
| 2016 | +7.4% | +12.8% |
Total return each calendar year, distributions reinvested.
Top holdings
4 of the top ten overlap, at least 13% of each fund.
SPMO
- AAPL Apple Inc10.3%
- MU Micron Technology Inc8.8%
- JNJ Johnson & Johnson5.2%
- AMD Advanced Micro Devices Inc5.2%
- GOOGL Alphabet Inc Class A4.4%
- XOM ExxonMobil Holdings Corp3.9%
- GOOG Alphabet Inc Class C3.5%
- INTC Intel Corp3.4%
- CSCO Cisco Systems Inc2.5%
- MRK Merck & Co Inc2.5%
VTI
- NVDA NVIDIA Corp7.1%
- AAPL Apple Inc6.6%
- MSFT Microsoft Corp5.2%
- AMZN Amazon.com Inc3.3%
- GOOGL Alphabet Inc Class A2.8%
- AVGO Broadcom Inc2.3%
- META Meta Platforms Inc Class A2.2%
- GOOG Alphabet Inc Class C2.2%
- MU Micron Technology Inc1.6%
- TSLA Tesla Inc1.4%
SPMO vs VTI: questions
Is SPMO or VTI better?
It depends on the job. VTI pays more today (1.08% vs 0.87%), VTI costs less, and SPMO has the better total return over Oct 2015 to Oct 2026, with SPMO holding up better in its worst stretch. For income, look at yield and whether the payouts hold up; for growth, total return and drawdowns.
Which pays a higher dividend, SPMO or VTI?
VTI, at 1.08% against 0.87% for SPMO as of Nov 5, 2026. On $10,000 that's about $108 vs $87 a year at today's rates.
Which has the better total return?
SPMO. From Oct 2015 to Oct 2026, it returned 17.6% a year with distributions reinvested, against 13.9% for VTI. $10,000 became $59,481 vs $41,703.
Which is cheaper, SPMO or VTI?
VTI, with a 0.03% expense ratio against 0.13%.
Do SPMO and VTI hold the same things?
Partly. 4 of their top ten holdings match (AAPL, GOOGL, GOOG, MU), at least 13% of each fund. Owning both doubles up on those.
Related comparisons
Yields, costs and holdings as each fund reports them (via Yahoo Finance), updated daily; returns from month-end prices with distributions reinvested. SPMO leads on 6 of 8 measures above. For information only, not investment advice. Last fund data: Nov 5, 2026.
