COST vs PIFMF: Which Is the Better Dividend Stock?
As of Oct 27, 2026, COST (Costco Wholesale Corporation) screens as the stronger dividend stock, winning 5 of 8 head-to-head metrics. PIFMF offers the higher yield at 4.06%, COST has the higher dividend-safety score, and PIFMF looks like the better value (its fair-value estimate is 43% above its share price).
Key facts: COST vs PIFMF
Data as of · Source: SmarterDividends data
- As of Oct 27, 2026, PT Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk (PIFMF) has the higher forward dividend yield at 4.06%, versus 0.59% for Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST).
- As of Oct 27, 2026, SmarterDividends grades COST's dividend safety A (97/100) and PIFMF's C (58/100).
- By SmarterDividends' count as of Oct 27, 2026, COST has raised its dividend for 21 consecutive years and PIFMF for 1.
- As of Oct 27, 2026, COST pays out 27% of its earnings as dividends and PIFMF pays out 27%.
- As of Oct 27, 2026, COST's fair-value estimate is 51% below its share price and PIFMF's fair-value estimate is 43% above its share price, so PIFMF looks like the better value of the two on SmarterDividends' blended model.
Cite this page
SmarterDividends, "COST vs PIFMF: Dividend Yield, Safety & Value Compared," updated Oct 27, 2026, https://smarterdividends.com/compare/cost-vs-pifmf
| Metric | COST | PIFMF |
|---|---|---|
| Forward yield | 0.59% | 4.06% |
| Annual dividend | $5.88 | $0.02 |
| Payout ratio | 27% | 27% |
| Years of growth | 21 yr | 1 yr |
| 5-yr dividend growth | 13.0% | -2.2% |
| 5-yr total return | 86% | -9% |
| Dividend safety score | 97 (A) | 58 (C) |
| Fair value estimate | $489.60 | $0.57 |
| Upside to fair value | -51% | +43% |
| Frequency | quarterly | annual |
| Market cap | $445.4B | $3.5B |
| P/E ratio | 48.4 | 6.7 |
Higher yield
PIFMF
4.06%
Safer dividend
COST
Grade A
Faster growth
COST
13.0%
Better value
PIFMF
+43% upside
COST vs PIFMF — FAQ
Is COST or PIFMF a better dividend stock?
On the data, COST wins more head-to-head categories (5 vs 3). PIFMF offers the higher yield (4.06%), while COST has the stronger dividend-safety score. The right pick depends on whether you prioritise income, safety or value.
Which has a higher dividend yield, COST or PIFMF?
PIFMF has the higher forward dividend yield at 4.06%, versus 0.59% for COST.
Is COST or PIFMF safer?
COST has the higher dividend-safety score (97/100 vs 58/100), reflecting stronger payout coverage and dividend-growth history.
Is COST or PIFMF better value right now?
As of Oct 27, 2026, PIFMF looks like the better value: its fair-value estimate is 43% above its share price (undervalued). For COST, its fair-value estimate is 51% below its share price.
Related comparisons
See more dividend stock comparisons · data refreshes daily · for informational purposes only, not investment advice.