COST vs RBGPF: Which Is the Better Dividend Stock?
As of Oct 23, 2026, COST (Costco Wholesale Corporation) screens as the stronger dividend stock, winning 6 of 8 head-to-head metrics. RBGPF offers the higher yield at 4.13%, COST has the higher dividend-safety score, and RBGPF looks like the better value (its fair-value estimate is 19% above its share price).
Key facts: COST vs RBGPF
Data as of · Source: SmarterDividends data
- As of Oct 23, 2026, Reckitt Benckiser Group plc (RBGPF) has the higher forward dividend yield at 4.13%, versus 0.58% for Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST).
- As of Oct 23, 2026, SmarterDividends grades COST's dividend safety A (97/100) and RBGPF's C (57/100).
- By SmarterDividends' count as of Oct 23, 2026, COST has raised its dividend for 21 consecutive years and RBGPF for 3.
- As of Oct 23, 2026, COST pays out 27% of its earnings as dividends and RBGPF pays out 49%.
- As of Oct 23, 2026, COST's fair-value estimate is 52% below its share price and RBGPF's fair-value estimate is 19% above its share price, so RBGPF looks like the better value of the two on SmarterDividends' blended model.
Cite this page
SmarterDividends, "COST vs RBGPF: Dividend Yield, Safety & Value Compared," updated Oct 23, 2026, https://smarterdividends.com/compare/cost-vs-rbgpf
| Metric | COST | RBGPF |
|---|---|---|
| Forward yield | 0.58% | 4.13% |
| Annual dividend | $5.88 | $2.90 |
| Payout ratio | 27% | 49% |
| Years of growth | 21 yr | 3 yr |
| 5-yr dividend growth | 13.0% | 3.8% |
| 5-yr total return | 83% | -7% |
| Dividend safety score | 97 (A) | 57 (C) |
| Fair value estimate | $487.61 | $83.27 |
| Upside to fair value | -52% | +19% |
| Frequency | quarterly | quarterly |
| Market cap | $451.2B | $44.4B |
| P/E ratio | 49.0 | 11.8 |
Higher yield
RBGPF
4.13%
Safer dividend
COST
Grade A
Faster growth
COST
13.0%
Better value
RBGPF
+19% upside
COST vs RBGPF — FAQ
Is COST or RBGPF a better dividend stock?
On the data, COST wins more head-to-head categories (6 vs 2). RBGPF offers the higher yield (4.13%), while COST has the stronger dividend-safety score. The right pick depends on whether you prioritise income, safety or value.
Which has a higher dividend yield, COST or RBGPF?
RBGPF has the higher forward dividend yield at 4.13%, versus 0.58% for COST.
Is COST or RBGPF safer?
COST has the higher dividend-safety score (97/100 vs 57/100), reflecting stronger payout coverage and dividend-growth history.
Is COST or RBGPF better value right now?
As of Oct 23, 2026, RBGPF looks like the better value: its fair-value estimate is 19% above its share price (undervalued). For COST, its fair-value estimate is 52% below its share price.
Related comparisons
See more dividend stock comparisons · data refreshes daily · for informational purposes only, not investment advice.