COST vs SVNDF: Which Is the Better Dividend Stock?
As of Nov 6, 2026, COST (Costco Wholesale Corporation) screens as the stronger dividend stock, winning 6 of 8 head-to-head metrics. SVNDF offers the higher yield at 2.70%, COST has the higher dividend-safety score, and SVNDF looks like the better value (its fair-value estimate is 10% above its share price).
Key facts: COST vs SVNDF
Data as of · Source: SmarterDividends data
- As of Nov 6, 2026, Seven & i Holdings Co., Ltd. (SVNDF) has the higher forward dividend yield at 2.70%, versus 0.55% for Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST).
- As of Nov 6, 2026, SmarterDividends grades COST's dividend safety A (97/100) and SVNDF's C (57/100).
- By SmarterDividends' count as of Nov 6, 2026, COST has raised its dividend for 21 consecutive years and SVNDF for 2.
- As of Nov 6, 2026, COST pays out 27% of its earnings as dividends and SVNDF pays out 44%.
- As of Nov 6, 2026, COST's fair-value estimate is 54% below its share price and SVNDF's fair-value estimate is 10% above its share price, so SVNDF looks like the better value of the two on SmarterDividends' blended model.
Cite this page
SmarterDividends, "COST vs SVNDF: Dividend Yield, Safety & Value Compared," updated Nov 6, 2026, https://smarterdividends.com/compare/cost-vs-svndf
| Metric | COST | SVNDF |
|---|---|---|
| Forward yield | 0.55% | 2.70% |
| Annual dividend | $5.88 | $0.38 |
| Payout ratio | 27% | 44% |
| Years of growth | 21 yr | 2 yr |
| 5-yr dividend growth | 13.0% | 0.8% |
| 5-yr total return | 88% | -1% |
| Dividend safety score | 97 (A) | 57 (C) |
| Fair value estimate | $491.02 | $15.45 |
| Upside to fair value | -54% | +10% |
| Frequency | quarterly | semiannual |
| Market cap | $472.2B | $31.9B |
| P/E ratio | 51.3 | 18.0 |
Higher yield
SVNDF
2.70%
Safer dividend
COST
Grade A
Faster growth
COST
13.0%
Better value
SVNDF
+10% upside
COST vs SVNDF — FAQ
Is COST or SVNDF a better dividend stock?
On the data, COST wins more head-to-head categories (6 vs 2). SVNDF offers the higher yield (2.70%), while COST has the stronger dividend-safety score. The right pick depends on whether you prioritise income, safety or value.
Which has a higher dividend yield, COST or SVNDF?
SVNDF has the higher forward dividend yield at 2.70%, versus 0.55% for COST.
Is COST or SVNDF safer?
COST has the higher dividend-safety score (97/100 vs 57/100), reflecting stronger payout coverage and dividend-growth history.
Is COST or SVNDF better value right now?
As of Nov 6, 2026, SVNDF looks like the better value: its fair-value estimate is 10% above its share price (fairly valued). For COST, its fair-value estimate is 54% below its share price.
Related comparisons
See more dividend stock comparisons · data refreshes daily · for informational purposes only, not investment advice.