SmarterDividends

COST vs PRBZF: Which Is the Better Dividend Stock?

As of Oct 27, 2026, COST (Costco Wholesale Corporation) screens as the stronger dividend stock, winning 6 of 8 head-to-head metrics. PRBZF offers the higher yield at 4.58%, COST has the higher dividend-safety score, and PRBZF looks like the better value (its fair-value estimate is 15% above its share price).

Key facts: COST vs PRBZF

Data as of · Source: SmarterDividends data

  • As of Oct 27, 2026, Premium Brands Holdings Corporation (PRBZF) has the higher forward dividend yield at 4.58%, versus 0.59% for Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST).
  • As of Oct 27, 2026, SmarterDividends grades COST's dividend safety A (97/100) and PRBZF's D (38/100).
  • By SmarterDividends' count as of Oct 27, 2026, COST has raised its dividend for 21 consecutive years and PRBZF for 0.
  • As of Oct 27, 2026, COST's fair-value estimate is 51% below its share price and PRBZF's fair-value estimate is 15% above its share price, so PRBZF looks like the better value of the two on SmarterDividends' blended model.
Cite this page

SmarterDividends, "COST vs PRBZF: Dividend Yield, Safety & Value Compared," updated Oct 27, 2026, https://smarterdividends.com/compare/cost-vs-prbzf

MetricCOSTPRBZF
Forward yield0.59%4.58%
Annual dividend$5.88$2.39
Payout ratio27%507%
Years of growth21 yr0 yr
5-yr dividend growth13.0%7.2%
5-yr total return86%-47%
Dividend safety score97 (A)38 (D)
Fair value estimate$489.60$59.94
Upside to fair value-51%+15%
Frequencyquarterlyquarterly
Market cap$445.4B$2.7B
P/E ratio48.4108.8

Higher yield

PRBZF

4.58%

Safer dividend

COST

Grade A

Faster growth

COST

13.0%

Better value

PRBZF

+15% upside

COST vs PRBZF — FAQ

Is COST or PRBZF a better dividend stock?

On the data, COST wins more head-to-head categories (6 vs 2). PRBZF offers the higher yield (4.58%), while COST has the stronger dividend-safety score. The right pick depends on whether you prioritise income, safety or value.

Which has a higher dividend yield, COST or PRBZF?

PRBZF has the higher forward dividend yield at 4.58%, versus 0.59% for COST.

Is COST or PRBZF safer?

COST has the higher dividend-safety score (97/100 vs 38/100), reflecting stronger payout coverage and dividend-growth history.

Is COST or PRBZF better value right now?

As of Oct 27, 2026, PRBZF looks like the better value: its fair-value estimate is 15% above its share price (fairly valued). For COST, its fair-value estimate is 51% below its share price.

See more dividend stock comparisons · data refreshes daily · for informational purposes only, not investment advice.